Snow Leopard is Leopard, just faster.
Written by Chris Tangora   
Friday, 27 June 2008
It seems like Snow Leopard is just going to be another version of Leopard, but a lot faster.  The big idea is that the systems is being optimized for it's current environment, much like a Snow Leopard is specialized for it's environment.  Some interesting snippets have been picked up by the media, but there have been a few that might have slipped by the cracks.

We all know about the ability for the Mac to use multiple processors and the GPU if the programs are written correctly.  That will help speed up the applications, but one thing that hasn't been mentioned is memory management.  According to a reliable source the memory management in Snow Leopard is drastically improved on multiple fronts.  Apple has revamped their memory management and added a new feature to release unused memory before it has to write to a disc.  This should keep your system running faster, even when running multiple applications.

Image capture is supposed to get a good re-working as well.  We already saw more RAW support in Leopard, and 10.6 is going to bring even more RAW support and improved scanning features.  The Image Capture functionality is also going to be pulling heavily on the GPU for improved performance.

There are going to be a lot more apps that are coming across as 64 bit as well.  This is something that Apple is doing to trim down the OS.  Since the dynamic libraries for 32bit and 64bit applications are different, you have to load the libraries for your respective application.  If Apple moves their apps to 64 bit compatibility then you have to load less dynamic libraries.  Less loading means more space in the RAM which means a faster Mac.

I hope at least some of this is new to you.  The 64 bit applications make sense as to why the beta was released as an Intel only OS, but it should support 64bit PPC in the near future.  But my money is that in 10.7 you will see an Intel only operating system.  That is when we will see the cool applications, since they can truly be built for a specific environment.

Apple's Snow Leopard Page




Comments (3)
01-07-2008 13:44
 
I've heard some speculation that v10.6 will be offered as a free upgrade to users of v10.5 (like v10.1 was for v10.0 users), which I doubt will happen, but if there's going to be any price reduction at all I think Apple will at least charge $30 or something to stay consistent with its "we had to charge for the update for accounting purposes" mantra. 
 
Even if Apple charges the standard $130 for this upgrade, it would be well worth it as far as I'm concerned. Increased speed, efficiency, and stability is worth $130! I know not everyone is happy about Snow Leopard being relatively free of new consumer-oriented features, but I'm stoked about Snow Leopard because I recognize that the underlying technologies are a big part of what makes Mac OS X so great. Speaking of which, ZFS support is supposed to be coming, too! w00t!
Registered
 
27-06-2008 22:14
 
No, it will run it fine. But it won't run it as well as it would on a 64 bit system. 
 
Basically Apple is drawing a line in the sand. If you have a lot of memory, a good graphics card, and a dual 64bit processor you will be able to take advantage of the increased speeds. 
 
If you don't have them, then you will not see the improvements that everyone else has. But back to your question, I believe that your MacBook is packing more than you think. 
 
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/intel/intel-hiding-features-from-users-153822.php
Registered
 
27-06-2008 16:47
 
Does that mean that it will rule out my core due macbook?
Registered
 

Write Comment

Name:
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments



 
< Prev   Next >
> latest forum topics
> latest forum posts